EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRA PETITUM PARTIUM IN DIVORCE CLAIMS IN RELIGIOUS COURTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The ultra petitum partiumis a principle that doesn’t allow judge to make verdicts on unrequested or over-demanding cases. In divorcement cases, ithas limited the authority of the judge in giving verdicts to grant women's rights. The existence of a Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) on number 3 of 2018 strengthened by PERMA on number 3 of 2017 concerning The Guidelines for Prosecuting Women Facing the Law opens a gap for judges to consider this principle. The type of this research is empirical legal research. The data obtained through field research and qualitative descriptive. The primary data sources in this study were collected through observations, and judges interview in the Metro Religious Courts. The secondary data sources are acquired from library (legislation and certain related books). The data analysis method conducted in 3 stages, 1. Collecting the data, 2.Restating the statement, and 3. Connecting the datawith existed theories. The results shows that the Metro Religious Court Judges still override the existence of a Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) number 3 of 2018 because it is only limited to the formulation of rooms that are not binding as legislations. It is may also be applied or ignored.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
References
Abdillah, A. (2016). Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium Dalam Perkara No: 0303/PDT. G/2015/PA. KDS. Tentang Cerai Talak Di Pengadilan Agama Kudus. STAIN Kudus.
Abdulloh, S. (2017). Ultra petitum partium dalam perkara cerai gugat di pengadilan agama Bandung: Analisis putusan nomor 3941/Pdt. G/2014/Pa. Bdg. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Al-Hasna, A. (2021). Wawancara dengan hakim Pengadilan Agama Metro.
Aljan, A. E. (2017). Pembaharuan Hukum Perdata Islam Praktik dan Gagasan Yogyakarta. UII Press.
Amarini, I., & Hidayah, A. N. (2019). Judicial activism resolving administrative disputes in Indonesia. 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019), 322–326.
Amin, M. (2021). Wawancara dengan hakim Pengadilan Agama Metro.
Aminudin, A. (2021). Wawancaran dengan hakim Pengadilan Agama Metro.
Aulia, T. R. N. (2017). Kompilasi hukum islam (hukum perkawinan, kewarisan dan perwakafan) / penulis. Nuansa Aulia.
Effendi, S., & Zein, M. (2004). Problematika Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer. Prenada Media.
Fakhria, S. (2018). Cerai Gugat Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Hak-Hak Finansial Perempuan. Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 91–119.
Habibi, A. R. (2016). Reorientation of rights and duties of husband and wife: Analitical studies of compilation of islamic law on Abdullah Saeed’s progressive islamic thought. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Hajjar, L. (2004). Religion, state power, and domestic violence in Muslim societies: A framework for comparative analysis. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(1), 1–38.
Harahap, V. Y. W. (2022). Mut’ah Rights From The Wife That Were Divorced Because Of Nusyuz. Journal Law Islamic Maqashid Al-Ahkam, 1(01), 50–63.
Jauhari, M. A. (2023). Legal Instruments For The Fulfillment Of The Rights Of Women and Children Post-Divorce In The Indonesian Legal System. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, 3494–3512.
Joko Subagyo, P. (2006). Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Kamaruddin, Z., & Shukor, A. K. A. (2003). A Preliminary Study on the Concept and Application of Ex-Parte in the Malaysian Shari’ah Courts. IIUMLJ, 11, 35.
Khan, A., Javed, K., Khan, A. S., & Rizwi, A. (2022). Aggression and individual criminal responsibility in the perspective of Islamic law. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(1), 35–48.
Kusmayadi, Y. (2020). Wawancara dengan hakim Pengadilan Agama Metro.
Manan, H. A. (2005). Penerapan hukum acara perdata di lingkungan peradilan agama. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Metro, P. A. (2019). Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan 2019 Pengadilan Agama Metro Kelas IA.
Metro, P. A. (2020). Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan 2020 Pengadilan Agama Metro Kelas IA.
Metro, P. A. (2021). Hasil Observasi di Pengadilan Agama Metro.
Mukti, A. (2017). Penemuan Hukum Islam Demi Mewujudkan Keadilan. Pustaka Pelajar.
Narbuko, C., & Achmadi, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian: Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Rehman, J. (2007). The sharia, Islamic family laws and international human rights law: Examining the theory and practice of polygamy and talaq. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21(1), 108–127.
Rohman, A. N., & Widyaningrum, H. (2020). Instrumentation Of Ex-Officio Rights Of Religious Courts Judge Related To Fulfilling Children And Wife’s Rights Due To Divorce. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(2), 361–378.
Sugiarti, S., Andalas, E. F., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Desain penelitian kualitatif sastra (Vol. 1). UMMPress.
Sunarto, S. (2016). Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 249–276.
Turatmiyah, S., Syaifuddin, M., Yahanan, A., Febrian, F., & Novera, A. (2019). Does Judge Has Ex Officio Rights In determining Mut’ah and Iddah? Sriwijaya Law Review, 3(2), 187–198.
Uzelac, A. (2013). Croatia: Omnipotent judges as the cause of procedural inefficiency and impotence. In Civil Litigation in China and Europe: Essays on the Role of the Judge and the Parties (pp. 197–221). Springer.